Deck Plan
The deck plan for all for alternate
solutions is the same. It is designed to
allow maximum educational access to all the students. The A-Frame is set off the stern of the
vessel, with the trawl net, weights, and chords attached to it. There are two areas for the A-Frame to be
controlled from. The two control areas
also have wire rolled into them, where the excess wire from the trawl net is
rolled. There are two doors that lead to
each engine using a ladder. The
wheelhouse is elongated and widened, to allow maximum student access. In the wheelhouse there will be multiple
navigational and research tools. All
around the base, there will be seating and 360˚ access to the vessel.
Alternate Solution 1
Introduction:
This solution is designed much like
the current R/V Blue Sea. The design has
booths set up on either side with one outlet towards the wall. On the starboard side of the boat, there is a
large table set up for a larger research space.
On the port side of the vessel, there is a storage area where the crew’s
boots and suits are located. In storage near
the crew storage, there are the rulers and buckets for the marine biology
classes. Additionally, there is a
berthing area towards the bow of the ship, which is a requirement for all
vessels over 65 feet long. The head is
located after the storage area towards the bow on the port side of the
vessel. Curtains separate the berthing
area and classroom area.
Pros:
·
Similar to the
Blue Sea
·
Area for teacher
and students to walk around
·
Comfortable
seating arrangement
·
Good for small
group work (3-5 people per group)
Cons:
·
Not a lot of
storage areas
·
Not comfortable
for lecture-style classes
·
Not many outlets
readily available to all students
Conclusion:
While
this solution is viable, it does not match what we want the end result to
be. There is not enough of a focus on a
group environment, and too much on individual studying. The large booths cut into the environment of
the class, and project an idea of separation.
Additionally, the lack of outlets does not meet the specification
stating the need for them.
Alternate Solution 2
Introduction:
This solution is designed to offer
a space for group work, and a space for individual/partner work. On the port side of the vessel, there is one
singular large table. Underneath this
table are ample amounts of storage, and the clean surface provides an area for
students to sit when they are not using any equipment and need to take
notes. The smaller, partner tables allow
for students to work in small groups to complete sections in a lab. Additionally, at each of the smaller tables,
there are outlets for microscope and other electronic tool use. There is a berthing area towards the bow of
the ship, which is a requirement for all vessels over 65 feet long. The head is located after the storage area
towards the bow on the port side of the vessel.
Curtains separate the berthing area and classroom area.
Pros:
·
Separate area for group work and individual work
·
Also separate area for the crew
·
Storage offered under tables
·
Large area for teacher to lecture in
·
Easy access to outlets
·
Conducive to a group environment
Cons:
·
Table takes up a lot of space
·
Not enough seats to let everyone sit at the
large table
·
Storage spaces are under table, may be difficult
to reach
Conclusion:
This solution is viable and matches
what we want the end result to be. The
two separate seating areas allow for the students to move from a
lecture/learning environment, into an individual research environment
flawlessly.
Alternate Solution 3
Introduction:
Alternate Solution 3 is designed to
focus on the group dynamics of a learning environment. There is one large table in the center of the
cabin, with storage space underneath.
Towards either side of the vessel, there are small desks that fit 1-2
people. This design allows students to
work in a large group with the teacher during the lecture portion of the class,
then break apart into small partner work for the research aspect of the
class. At each small desk, there is an
outlet for microscope and other electronic tool use. There is a berthing area towards the bow of
the ship, which is a requirement for all vessels over 65 feet long. The head is located after the storage area
towards the bow on the port side of the vessel.
Curtains separate the berthing area and classroom area.
Pros:
·
Area for group style lectures
·
Separate area for partner work
·
Easy access to outlets
·
Enough storage space
·
Comfortable seating arrangement
Cons:
·
Not enough seats to let everyone sit at the
large table
·
Storage spaces under table may be difficult to
reach
·
Seating area may get cramped for students using
notebooks
·
Not a large area for teachers to lecture in
Conclusion:
The solution is viable, and matches
what we want in a design. The large
table allows for students to engage in discussion, and the small desks allow
for individual and partner work.
However, the large table in the center does not work well with a teacher
lecturing.
Alternate Solution 4
This design is a combination of
alternate solution 2 and alternate solution 3.
There are two medium-sized tables in the center of the table, both
seating the same amount of students. In
the middle, there is a large lane for teachers to walk through, to allow for
fluidity during a presentation. On the
port and starboard sides, there are two large windows. These let the students see what is going on
surrounding the vessel during movement, and a standstill. Additionally, there is a berthing area
towards the bow of the ship, which is a requirement for all vessels over 65
feet long. The head is located after the
storage area towards the bow on the port side of the vessel. Curtains separate the berthing area and
classroom area.
Pros:
·
More than enough seating for everyone
·
Large view of the ocean
·
Conducive to a group learning environment
·
Comfortable for a teacher to lecture in
·
Easy for students to get into discussions
Cons:
·
Not conducive to a small group/individual
learning environment
·
Not easy for students to use electronic
equipment
·
Storage space is lacking
Conclusion:
While the solution is viable,
however it does not match what we want the end result to be. The solution is too focused on a group
environment, and while that works with certain aspects of the classes on the
vessel, certain other (such as physics and chemistry) have needs for individual
study areas.
Overall conclusion:
All the designs are viable. The
best one to fit the specifications and limitations is alternate solution
2. However, I do believe that in order
to get the perfect vessel, there will need to be a combination of multiple
designs. Mainly, there should be a
combination of alternate solution 2 and alternate solution 3. The combination of the two will give the
perfect combinations of habitability, usefulness, and a good learning
environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment